@book{5106,
  author       = {{Ayón, Angel and Pottgiesser, Uta and Richards, Nathaniel}},
  isbn         = {{3-0356-1932-8 }},
  keywords     = {{Fassade, Glasbau, Modernisierung (Bauwesen), Fassade, Stadtsanierung, Gebäudehülle, Gebäude}},
  pages        = {{256}},
  publisher    = {{Birkhäuser }},
  title        = {{{Neue Fassaden im Bestand. Sanierungsstrategien für Klassiker der Moderne }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{5110,
  author       = {{Ayón, Angel  and Pottgiesser, Uta and Richards, Nathaniel }},
  isbn         = {{ 3-0356-1934-4 }},
  keywords     = {{Fassade, Glasbau, Modernisierung (Bauwesen)}},
  pages        = {{256}},
  publisher    = {{Birkhäuser }},
  title        = {{{Reglazing Modernism. Intervention Strategies for 20th-Century Icons }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{10089,
  abstract     = {{Existing urban water infrastructures need to be modified if they are to cope with such challenges as demographic change, energy sufficiency and resource efficiency. It is believed that less centralised and hence more flexible systems adapt better to changing conditions. The main goal of this paper is to compare conventional and novel urban water infrastructures in five model areas in two German cities with regard to their sustainability. The novel technical options comprise modules such as blackwater and greywater separation, treatment and reuse as well as heat recovery, which are believed to be much more resource efficient than conventional systems. An assessment framework was developed which is able to comprehend corresponding transformation processes. An integrated assessment was conducted using multi-criteria decision analysis. The assessment results show that no particular technical option prevails over all the others and that the performance of the various options in the assessment is influenced by the general conditions found in the model areas. However, it can be concluded that novel water infrastructures can compete with or even perform better than conventional ones, especially when ecological and social criteria are emphasized.}},
  author       = {{Zimmermann, Martin and Felmeden, Jörg and Michel, Bernhard}},
  booktitle    = {{Water}},
  issn         = {{2073-4441 }},
  keywords     = {{Bauwesen, Effizienz, Finanzierung, Fracking}},
  number       = {{211}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI}},
  title        = {{{Integrated Assessment of Novel Urban Water Infrastructures in Frankfurt am Main and Hamburg, Germany}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020211}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{10074,
  author       = {{Winker, Martina and Libbe, Jens and Felmeden, Jörg and Giese, Thomas and Kunkel, Sabine}},
  booktitle    = {{Wasserinfrastrukturen für die zukunftsfähige Stadt : Beiträge aus der INIS-Forschung.}},
  keywords     = {{Abschlussarbeiten / Dissertation, Abwasserbehandlung, Bauwesen, Effizienz, Planung}},
  pages        = {{140–142}},
  publisher    = {{Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik gGmbH (Difu)}},
  title        = {{{Dependenz und Interdeprendenzen von Siedlungs- und Baustruktur mit der Wasser- und Energieinfrastruktur}}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@misc{10088,
  author       = {{Felmeden, Jörg and Michel, Bernhard and Zimmermann, Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{  KA : Korrespondenz Abwasser, Abfall ; Organ der DWA }},
  issn         = {{1866-0010}},
  keywords     = {{Bauwesen, Planung, Rohrsysteme}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{1082–1090}},
  publisher    = {{GFA, Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Abwassertechnik }},
  title        = {{{Neuartige Wasserinfrastruktutren - Ergebnisse der integrierten Bewertung aus Modellgebietsebene (netWORKS 3)}}},
  doi          = {{10.3242/kae2016.12.005}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

