@misc{12153,
  abstract     = {{In general gender differences have frequently been studied in experimental economics, but the findings remain inconclusive. In this study, we focus on gender differences in expectations and gender specific stereotypic mindsets in a dictator game, building on Blanckenburg, Tebbe, & Iseke (2023). We add to prior work by differentiating between stereotypical behavior and stereotypical expectations. Accordingly, we extended the classic dictator game by three steps in order to study whether recipients develop stereotypical beliefs regarding the dictator’s gender based on the amount of money the dictator has allocated to them. First, we asked recipients to estimate the amount. We then revealed the amount the dictator actually allocated to the recipient and finally, we asked the recipient to assess the dictator’s gender. In contrast to and building on previous results which show no gender differences regarding the amount the dictators allocate, we find evidence for stereotypical expectations of the recipients based on the amount the dictator allocates to them.}},
  author       = {{Austermann, Christine and von Blanckenburg, Korbinian and Iseke, Anja and Tebbe, Eva}},
  booktitle    = {{Journal of Economic Psychology}},
  issn         = {{0167-4870}},
  keywords     = {{Gender differences, Stereotypes, Dictator game, Economic behavior and expectations}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{Stereotypical behavior vs. expectations: Gender differences in a dictator game}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.joep.2024.102742}},
  volume       = {{103}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@misc{13013,
  abstract     = {{The relationship between green spaces and health is attracting more and more societal and research interest. The research field is however still suffering from its differing monodisciplinary origins. Now in a multidisciplinary environment on its way to a truly interdisciplinary field, there is a need for a common understanding, precision in green space indicators, and coherent assessment of the complexity of daily living environments. In several reviews, common protocols and open-source scripts are considered a high priority to advance the field. Realizing these issues, we developed PRIGSHARE (Preferred Reporting Items in Greenspace Health Research). It is accompanied by an open-source script that supports non-spatial disciplines in assessing greenness and green space on different scales and types. The PRIGSHARE checklist contains 21 items that have been identified as a risk of bias and are necessary for understanding and comparison of studies. The checklist is divided into the following topics: objectives (3 items), scope (3 items), spatial assessment (7 items), vegetation assessment (4 items), and context assessment (4 items). For each item, we include a pathway-specific (if relevant) rationale and explanation. The PRIGSHARE guiding principles should be helpful to support a high-quality assessment and synchronize the studies in the field while acknowledging the diversity of study designs.}},
  author       = {{Cardinali, Marcel and Beenackers, Mariëlle A. and van Timmeren, Arjan and Pottgiesser, Uta}},
  booktitle    = {{Environmental Research}},
  issn         = {{1096-0953}},
  keywords     = {{Greenspace, Well-being, Public health, Pollution, Behavior, Stress}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Preferred reporting items in green space health research. Guiding principles for an interdisciplinary field.}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.envres.2023.115893}},
  volume       = {{228}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@misc{13018,
  abstract     = {{Current societal challenges like climate change led to a general agreement that our cities need to become greener and our lifestyles more sustainable. This transformation of our daily living environments can also impact the prevalence of non-communicable diseases as a global disease burden of our time. These positive impacts of horizontal green spaces on human health are widely recognized. However, it is still unclear whether the same is true for green walls, as a promising nature-based solution for dense urban spaces which is increasingly applied. To date, the available research on green walls has not been systematically synthesized along the potential impact pathways of reducing environmental stressors (Mitigation), restoring capacities (Restoration), and promoting healthier behavior (Instoration). We conducted a systematic review of 30 reviews to synthesize available evidence on all three pathways and direct health outcomes, following the established strategies of PICOS and PRISMA. We assessed the review quality through AMSTAR. We found strong consistent evidence that green walls can mitigate urban heat island effects (daylight surface temperature: -0.3 °C to -31.9°, daylight air temperature: -0 °C to -8.7 °C), air pollution (PM2.5: -25% to -99%, PM10: -23% to -60%), and noise pollution (sound pressure level: -1dBA to -5dBA). We found some evidence for disaster risk reduction and restoration effects. There were no reviews on the instoration pathway or direct health outcomes. The underlying reviews rated low according to the AMSTAR checklist, which might limit our findings. We recognize a generally young research field and conclude that more in-field studies are needed in all pathways to better understand the relationship between green walls and health.}},
  author       = {{Cardinali, Marcel and Balderrama, Alvaro and Arztmann, Daniel and Pottgiesser, Uta}},
  booktitle    = {{Nature-Based Solutions}},
  issn         = {{2772-4115}},
  keywords     = {{Nature-based solutions, Green facades, Living walls, Health, Environmental risk factors, Well-being, Environmental comfort, Behavior}},
  number       = {{12}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier }},
  title        = {{{Green walls and health: An umbrella review}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100070}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@misc{13636,
  abstract     = {{Successful treatment not only depends on adhering to taking medication and attending therapy but also on behavioral changes. In two experiments (total N = 256), we investigated the hypothesis that the perceived social role of a treatment as partner (co-producer of a health-benefits) or servant (sole provider of health benefits) could promote or prevent intentions to engage in health-related behaviors. Specifically, we used headache treatment as an everyday example and found that participants were more inclined to engage in headache-reducing behaviors when painkillers were described as partners as compared to servants. Implications of these findings for the importance of anthropomorphic social perception in the clinical application are discussed. }},
  author       = {{Aengenheister, Jana S. and Urban, Renée and Halbeisen, Georg}},
  booktitle    = {{Zeitschrift für Psychologie}},
  issn         = {{2151-2604}},
  keywords     = {{social cognition, health behavior, anthropomorphism, headache}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{171--177}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe }},
  title        = {{{Cures That (Make You) Work How a Treatment's Social Role Affects Health-Related Behavioral Intentions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1027/2151-2604/a000449}},
  volume       = {{229}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{4096,
  abstract     = {{Projection-based assistive systems have shown to be a promising technology to support workers during manual assembly processes in industrial manufacturing by projecting instructions into the working area. While existing studies have investigated various aspects of these systems, little research has been conducted regarding the way in which the user accesses the provided instructions. In this paper we analyze the eye movements of users during the repeated execution of an assembly task at a projection-based assistive system in order to gain insights into the utilization of the presented instructions. For this purpose, we analyzed eye tracking recordings from a user study with 15 participants to investigate the sequences in which the respective instructions are observed by the users. The results show a significantly lower number of nonlinear gaze sequences as well as a significantly higher number of steps without observing the instructions during the repeated use of the assistive system. In addition, there was a significantly lower task completion time during repeated use of the assistive system.}},
  author       = {{Heinz, Mario and Büttner, Sebastian and Röcker, Carsten}},
  booktitle    = {{22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-030-50343-7}},
  keywords     = {{Assistive systems, Eye tracking, Human behavior}},
  location     = {{Copenhagen, Denmark}},
  pages        = {{259--272}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Exploring Users' Eye Movements When Using Projection-based Assembly Assistive Systems}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50344-4_19}},
  volume       = {{12203}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}