@misc{13678,
  abstract     = {{The previous methodology for optimizing CO2 emissions and electricity costs in industrial applications is extended by integrating dynamic load shifting with battery energy storage. Building on earlier work that employed Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) to manage a stationary battery based on real-time electricity prices and CO2 intensity signals, two industrial machines and one electric vehicle (EV) are now incorporated as additional shiftable loads. These new elements introduce further operational constraints while enhancing energy management flexibility. The framework employs an adjustable weighting factor λ to balance environmental impact and cost, and comparative analyses across three scenarios—battery-only, load-shifting-only, and combined—demonstrate nearly additive CO2 reductions alongside non-additive cost improvements, underscoring the synergistic potential for environmental benefits despite diminishing cost returns. Moreover, validation against dynamic programming confirms the MILP approach’s accuracy and computational efficiency.}},
  author       = {{Mousavi, Seyed Davood and Schulte, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{2025 5th International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET)}},
  keywords     = {{Feeds, Antennas, System-on-chip, Application specific integrated circuits, Life cycle assessment, Product lifecycle management, Radio access networks, Regional area networks, Smart devices, OWL}},
  location     = {{Paris, France }},
  publisher    = {{IEEE}},
  title        = {{{Enhanced Dynamic Optimization for CO2 Reduction and Cost Savings through Load Shifting in Smart Factories}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/icecet63943.2025.11472530}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}

@misc{10010,
  abstract     = {{During product development, the customer or internal stakeholders initiate changes concerning the components or functions of a cyber-physical system (CPS). The complexity of such a CPS causes difficulties in evaluating the effects of a component change. Accordingly, product developers need an assistance system to quantify the impact of a component change on hardware, software, system functions, and production processes. Therefore, this paper focuses on concepts to evaluate the effects of component, functional, and process changes and contributes to its clarification and further understanding of the importance and requirements for such an assistance system. The literature review assesses the identified methods regarding their objectives, application objects, level of automation, and relations characteristics. However, the literature review pointed out that the change prediction method from Clarkson et al. (2004) is well-established in the literature and able to quantify the impact of a change.}},
  author       = {{Mordaschew, Viktoria and Herrmann, Jan-Phillip and Tackenberg, Sven}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the International Conference onEngineering Design (ICED23)}},
  issn         = {{2732-527X }},
  keywords     = {{Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), Change Impact, Complexity, Uncertainty}},
  location     = {{Bordeaux, Frankreich}},
  pages        = {{2655--2664}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press}},
  title        = {{{METHODS OF CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.266 }},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{7783,
  abstract     = {{The digitization of the industry, the drive towards smart factories as well as the Internet of Production (IoP) require rising smartness of products and services. Smart physical products are often mechatronic products that include increasing amounts of software. The development of software, however, comes along with new challenges for companies specialized in developing mechanical, electrical or electronic products. Some of these challenges address the product lifecycle management (PLM)-related business and work processes. The management of software lifecycles requires a much more rigorous requirements management. Furthermore, special solutions for management of source code in distributed development teams are needed. The build-process and testing activities need to be conducted in a systematic manner. The generation and provision of different licensing models need to be mastered and finally the issue of security needs to be addressed for any product that can be networked---which by the way is a strategic target of nearly any product developing company. Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) covers many of the above-mentioned issues. IT solutions for ALM are comparable to traditional PLM solutions, but focus particularly on software as a product. Thus, these systems have become widely used by software companies in the same manner as PLM solutions belong to the standard enterprise IT environment of companies developing physical products. With software penetrating traditional physical products, product managers, product developers, manufacturing staff etc. need to work with both, PLM and ALM, since neither solution is able to cover both domains sufficiently. However, ALM and PLM solutions feature redundant functionality. Thus, best practices for the systematic integration of ALM and PLM are required.}},
  author       = {{Deuter, Andreas and Otte, Andreas and Ebert, Marcel and Possel-Dölken, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{Product lifecycle management (Volume 4)}},
  editor       = {{Stark, John}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-030-16133-0}},
  issn         = {{2197-6589}},
  keywords     = {{Product lifecycle management, Application Lifecycle Management, Smart products, Systems engineering}},
  pages        = {{125--143}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Developing the Requirements of a PLM/ALM Integration: An Industrial Case Study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-16134-7_11}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{12798,
  abstract     = {{The digitization of the industry requires smart products and services. Smart products are mechatronic products with an increasing amount of software. To get high quality smart products to the market quickly, manufacturers need to reshape their product lifecycle processes. They need to apply system engineering-based methods to enable smooth cross-domain developments with a special focus on the software domain. One significant challenge faced by manufacturers is the harmonization of product lifecycle management (PLM), which addresses the hardware lifecycle, with application lifecycle management (ALM), which addresses the software lifecycle.

To support manufacturers in this challenging activity, this paper demonstrates a proven process for developing use cases and requirements associated with a PLM/ALM integration. This process has been elicited during an industrial case study in a manufacturing company. This paper explains this process in detail. A generally applicable approach for developing the requirements of a PLM/ALM integration is extracted by removing the company-specific factors. }},
  author       = {{Deuter, Andreas and Otte, Andreas and Ebert, Marcel and Possel-Dölken, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{4th International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence - Intelligent, Flexible and Connected Systems in Products and Production}},
  editor       = {{Denkena, B. and Thoben, K. D.  and Trachtler, A.}},
  issn         = {{2351-9789}},
  keywords     = {{Product lifecycle management, Application Lifecycle Management, Smart products, Systems engineering}},
  location     = {{Hannover}},
  pages        = {{107--113}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Developing the Requirements of a PLM/ALM Integration: An Industrial Case Study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.020}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}