@inbook{5817, abstract = {{The Handbook aims to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive NBS impact assessment framework, and a robust set of indicators and methodologies to assess impacts of nature-based solutions across 12 societal challenge areas: Climate Resilience; Water Management; Natural and Climate Hazards; Green Space Management; Biodiversity; Air Quality; Place Regeneration; Knowledge and Social Capacity Building for Sustainable Urban Transformation; Participatory Planning and Governance; Social Justice and Social Cohesion; Health and Well-being; New Economic Opportunities and Green Jobs. Indicators have been developed collaboratively by representatives of 17 individual EU-funded NBS projects and collaborating institutions such as the EEA and JRC, as part of the European Taskforce for NBS Impact Assessment, with the four-fold objective of: serving as a reference for relevant EU policies and activities; orient urban practitioners in developing robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions at different scales; expand upon the pioneering work of the EKLIPSE framework by providing a comprehensive set of indicators and methodologies; and build the European evidence base regarding NBS impacts. They reflect the state of the art in current scientific research on impacts of nature-based solutions and valid and standardized methods of assessment, as well as the state of play in urban implementation of evaluation frameworks.}}, author = {{Skodra, Julita and Connop, Stuart and Tacnet, Jean-Marc and Van Cauwenbergh, Nora and Almassy, D. and Baldacchini, C. and Basco Carrera, L. and Caitana, B. and Cardinali, Marcel and Feliu, E. and Garcia, I. and Garcia-Blanco, G. and Jones, G. and Kraus, L. and Mahmoud, I. and Maia, S. and Morello, E. and Pérez Lapena, B. and Pinter, L. and Porcu, F. and Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. and Ruangpan, L. and Rutzinger, M. and Vojinovic, Z.}}, booktitle = {{Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions. A handbook for practitioners}}, editor = {{Dumitru, Adina and Wendling, Laura}}, isbn = {{978-92-76-22961-2}}, keywords = {{atmospheric pollution, biodiversity, community resilience, database, decision-making, environmental impact, environmental indicator, environmental risk prevention, innovation, natural hazard, sustainable development, urban area, user guide, waste management}}, pages = {{46--69}}, publisher = {{Publications Office of the European Union}}, title = {{{Principles Guiding NBS Performance and Impact Evaluation}}}, doi = {{10.2777/244577}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{5821, abstract = {{The Handbook aims to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive NBS impact assessment framework, and a robust set of indicators and methodologies to assess impacts of nature-based solutions across 12 societal challenge areas: Climate Resilience; Water Management; Natural and Climate Hazards; Green Space Management; Biodiversity; Air Quality; Place Regeneration; Knowledge and Social Capacity Building for Sustainable Urban Transformation; Participatory Planning and Governance; Social Justice and Social Cohesion; Health and Well-being; New Economic Opportunities and Green Jobs. Indicators have been developed collaboratively by representatives of 17 individual EU-funded NBS projects and collaborating institutions such as the EEA and JRC, as part of the European Taskforce for NBS Impact Assessment, with the four-fold objective of: serving as a reference for relevant EU policies and activities; orient urban practitioners in developing robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions at different scales; expand upon the pioneering work of the EKLIPSE framework by providing a comprehensive set of indicators and methodologies; and build the European evidence base regarding NBS impacts. They reflect the state of the art in current scientific research on impacts of nature-based solutions and valid and standardized methods of assessment, as well as the state of play in urban implementation of evaluation frameworks.}}, author = {{Dumitru, Adina and Garcia, Igone and Zorita, Saioa and Tomé-Lourido, Davidé and Cardinali, Marcel and Feliu, E. and Fermoso, J. and Ferilli, G. and Guidolotti, G. and Hölscher, K. and Lodder, M. and Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. and Rinta-Hiiro, V. and Maia, S.}}, booktitle = {{Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions. A handbook for practitioners}}, editor = {{Adina, Dumitru and Laura, Wendling}}, isbn = {{978-92-76-22961-2}}, keywords = {{atmospheric pollution, biodiversity, community resilience, database, decision-making, environmental impact, environmental indicator, environmental risk prevention, innovation, natural hazard, sustainable development, urban area, user guide, waste management}}, pages = {{78--104}}, publisher = {{Publications Office of the European Union}}, title = {{{Approaches to Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy Development}}}, doi = {{10.2777/244577}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{5824, abstract = {{The Handbook aims to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive NBS impact assessment framework, and a robust set of indicators and methodologies to assess impacts of nature-based solutions across 12 societal challenge areas: Climate Resilience; Water Management; Natural and Climate Hazards; Green Space Management; Biodiversity; Air Quality; Place Regeneration; Knowledge and Social Capacity Building for Sustainable Urban Transformation; Participatory Planning and Governance; Social Justice and Social Cohesion; Health and Well-being; New Economic Opportunities and Green Jobs. Indicators have been developed collaboratively by representatives of 17 individual EU-funded NBS projects and collaborating institutions such as the EEA and JRC, as part of the European Taskforce for NBS Impact Assessment, with the four-fold objective of: serving as a reference for relevant EU policies and activities; orient urban practitioners in developing robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions at different scales; expand upon the pioneering work of the EKLIPSE framework by providing a comprehensive set of indicators and methodologies; and build the European evidence base regarding NBS impacts. They reflect the state of the art in current scientific research on impacts of nature-based solutions and valid and standardized methods of assessment, as well as the state of play in urban implementation of evaluation frameworks.}}, author = {{Cardinali, Marcel}}, booktitle = {{Evaluating the Impact of Nature-based Solutions: Appendix of Methods}}, editor = {{Adina, Dumitru and Laura, Wendling}}, isbn = {{978-92-76-22960-5}}, keywords = {{atmospheric pollution, biodiversity, community resilience, database, decision-making, environmental impact, environmental indicator, environmental risk prevention, innovation, natural hazard, sustainable development, urban area, user guide, waste management}}, publisher = {{Publications Office of the European Union}}, title = {{{Contributors to Indicators of NBS Performance and Impact Assessment}}}, doi = {{10.2777/11361}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{1934, abstract = {{The Old Belgrade Fairground, a great example of the Early Modernism in Belgrade, underlined the modernization and Europeanization of the capital city of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The Fairground's construction in 1937 on the bare terrain of today's New Belgrade was the first step of urbanisation of Belgrade on the left bank of the Sava river and was followed by the construction of the modern city after WWII. During the 80 years long history, the purpose of the Old Belgrade Fairground has been changed several times creating multilayered identity of the urban complex. The Modern exhibition space of the inter-war period was transformed into the infamous concentration camp during WWII. Structures that survived the bombings were re-used as a habitat for youth brigades that participated in the construction of New Belgrade, while its previous purposes were suppressed. During the rebuilding of the city in the post-war period, the Old Belgrade Fairground was ignored. As forgotten place of memory it was partly adapted by artists into ateliers and partly became shelter for poor people. Despite its multileveled historical, cultural and architectural significance, the Old Belgrade Fairground today is neglected. Although a pioneer of Modern Movement in Belgrade, and at the same time an important memorial place, it is today a ruined structure that is decaying. Its multiple histories and "too much identity" created absence of any planned activity in order not to make a wrong one. After its ability to absorb different functions and adapt to huge transformations, its resilience is being contested by disability to balance the complex history. The paper investigates on the transformations and presents a concept of "dissonant heritage" as an instrument for renewal of the Old Belgrade Fairground that needs to use all of its complexity in order to truly recover from the past.}}, author = {{Dragutinovic, Anica and Pottgiesser, Uta and Melenhorst, Michael}}, editor = {{Melenhorst, Michel and Pottgiesser, Uta and Naumann, Christine and Kellner, Theresa}}, keywords = {{Old Belgrade Fairground, Modern Structure, Multilayered Identity, Resilience, Dissonant Heritage}}, location = {{Detmold}}, pages = {{9}}, title = {{{Contested Resilience of a Modern Structure or “Dissonant Heritage”: Multilayered Identity of the Old Belgrade Fairground}}}, doi = {{10.25644/2412-8d28}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{12244, abstract = {{In this paper the concept of resilience is discussed on the base of 13 case studies from the German branch of the International Long-Term Ecological Research Program. In the introduction the resilience approach is presented as one possibility to describe ecosystem dynamics. The relations with the concepts of adaptability and ecological integrity are discussed and the research questions are formulated. The focal research objectives are related to the conditions of resilient behaviour of ecosystems, the role of spatio-temporal scales, the differences between short- or long-term dynamics, the basic methodological requirements to exactly define resilience, the role of the reference state and indicators and the suitability of resilience as a management concept. The main part of the paper consists of 13 small case study descriptions, which demonstrate phase transitions and resilient dynamics of several terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at different time scales. In the discussion, some problems arising from the interpretation of the time series are highlighted and discussed. The topics of discussion are the conceptual challenges of the resilience approach, methodological problems, the role of indicator selection, the complex interactions between different disturbances, the significance of time scales and a comparison of the case studies. The article ends with a conclusion which focuses on the demand to link resilience with adaptability, in order to support the long-term dynamics of ecosystem development.}}, author = {{Müller, F. and Bergmann, M. and Dannowski, R. and Dippner, J.W. and Gnauck, A. and Haase, P. and Jochimsen, Marc C. and Kasprzak, P. and Kröncke, I. and Kümmerlin, R. and Küster, M. and Lischeid, G. and Meesenburg, H. and Merz, C. and Millat, G. and Müller, J. and Padisák, J. and Schimming, C.G. and Schubert, H. and Schult, M. and Selmeczy, G. and Shatwell, Tom and Stoll, S. and Schwabe, M. and Soltwedel, T. and Straile, D. and Theuerkauf, M.}}, booktitle = {{ Ecological indicators : integrating monitoring, assessment and management}}, issn = {{1872-7034}}, keywords = {{Long-term ecological research, LTER, Ecosystem resilience and adaptability, Spatio-temporal scales, Indicator selection}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{10--43}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Assessing resilience in long-term ecological data sets}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.066}}, volume = {{65}}, year = {{2015}}, }