@misc{13013,
  abstract     = {{The relationship between green spaces and health is attracting more and more societal and research interest. The research field is however still suffering from its differing monodisciplinary origins. Now in a multidisciplinary environment on its way to a truly interdisciplinary field, there is a need for a common understanding, precision in green space indicators, and coherent assessment of the complexity of daily living environments. In several reviews, common protocols and open-source scripts are considered a high priority to advance the field. Realizing these issues, we developed PRIGSHARE (Preferred Reporting Items in Greenspace Health Research). It is accompanied by an open-source script that supports non-spatial disciplines in assessing greenness and green space on different scales and types. The PRIGSHARE checklist contains 21 items that have been identified as a risk of bias and are necessary for understanding and comparison of studies. The checklist is divided into the following topics: objectives (3 items), scope (3 items), spatial assessment (7 items), vegetation assessment (4 items), and context assessment (4 items). For each item, we include a pathway-specific (if relevant) rationale and explanation. The PRIGSHARE guiding principles should be helpful to support a high-quality assessment and synchronize the studies in the field while acknowledging the diversity of study designs.}},
  author       = {{Cardinali, Marcel and Beenackers, Mariëlle A. and van Timmeren, Arjan and Pottgiesser, Uta}},
  booktitle    = {{Environmental Research}},
  issn         = {{1096-0953}},
  keywords     = {{Greenspace, Well-being, Public health, Pollution, Behavior, Stress}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Preferred reporting items in green space health research. Guiding principles for an interdisciplinary field.}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.envres.2023.115893}},
  volume       = {{228}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@misc{13578,
  abstract     = {{In recent years, virtual reality (VR) technology has found its way into nearly all fields of psychology. Previous studies indicated that virtual reality adaptations of the TSST are less potent in stimulating HPA-axis responses, with lower salivary cortisol responses recorded as compared to the in-vivo TSST. (TSST-IV). In the present experiment we tested the stress-induction potential of a refined version of the TSST-VR using a fully orthogonal experimental design in which ninety-three healthy males were either assigned to the TSST condition or a corresponding control condition in a real or virtual environment. We found a significant increase of endocrine, autonomic and self-reported stress markers in both stress conditions. Notably, we found a robust rise in salivary cortisol to the TSST-VR comparable to that observed in the TSST-IV. Despite subtle differences in response between virtual and in vivo settings, we conclude that VR adaptations of in-vivo stressors have the potential to induce real physiological and subjective reactions.}},
  author       = {{Zimmer, Patrick and Buttlar, Benjamin and Halbeisen, Georg and Walther, Eva and Domes,  Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Psychoneuroendocrinology}},
  issn         = {{1873-3360}},
  keywords     = {{Psychological stress, Virtual reality, Trier Social Stress Test, Free salivary cortisol, Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, Alpha amylase}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{186--192}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{Virtually stressed? A refined virtual reality adaptation of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) induces robust endocrine responses}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.010}},
  volume       = {{101}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{728,
  abstract     = {{Dieser Beitrag diskutiert den Stand der aktuellen Belastungs- und Beanspruchungsforschung. Dabei werden insbesondere die zunehmend eingesetzten objektiven, meist auch mobil einsetzbaren Instrumente zur Erfassung von körperlichen und mentalen Beanspruchungen sowohl im Labor als auch am Arbeitsplatz kritisch reflektiert. Nach einem Blick auf die immer noch vorhandenen definitorischen Probleme in der Stressforschung betrachten wir wichtige methodische Herausforderungen und neue theoretische Entwicklungen in der Stressforschung. Abschließend werden die neun Beiträge in diesem Heft mit Blick auf ihre zentralen Anliegen und wichtigsten Ergebnisse zusammengefasst.}},
  author       = {{Bornewasser, Manfred and Wege, Jürgen}},
  issn         = {{1615-7729}},
  journal      = {{Wirtschaftspsychologie}},
  keywords     = {{Belastung, Beanspruchung, Stress, Ressourcen, Wearables, objektive Messverfahren}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{3--11}},
  publisher    = {{Pabst Science Publ.}},
  title        = {{{Moderne Stressdiagnostik am Arbeitsplatz - theoretische und methodische Fortschritte}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{457,
  abstract     = {{Additive Manufacturing (AM) increasingly enables the realization of structures, which have a much greater freedom of design und can therefore better  use  nature  as  a  design  ideal.  Bionic  design  principles  have  already been introduced  into  general  design  approaches,  and  several topology optimization systems (TO) are available today to increase structural stiffness and  to  enable  lightweight  design.  AM  and  TO,  used  in  synergy,  promise completely  new  application areas. However,  staircase effects resulting from a  layer-by-layer  build  process  and  unavoidable  support  structures  which must be mechanically removed afterwards are disadvantageous with respect to surface texture and strength properties.
The present article addresses the question  of how far the notches resulting from the staircase effect of Additive Manufacturing and the support structures  removed  decrease  the  strength  of  components.  Most  engineers try  to follow the inner flow of forces in a part’s design by smoothening surfaces in notched areas. Considering  this,  a  elected component  is investigated  with  finite  element  analysis  (FEA)  with  special  regard  for  the concentration  of  tress arising from surface notch effects. An outlook is given as regards how a reduction of the notch effect from the taircase effect can be achieved effectively.}},
  author       = {{Scheideler, Eva and Villmer, Franz-Josef and Adam, G. and Timmer, Mirco}},
  booktitle    = {{Production Engineering and Management Proceedings 6th International Conference}},
  editor       = {{Villmer, Franz-Josef and Padoano, Elio}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-946856-00-9}},
  keywords     = {{Additive  Manufacturing, Topology optimization, Staircase effect, Support structures, Stress concentration, Lightweight construction, Design rules, Notch effect}},
  location     = {{Lemgo}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{39--50}},
  title        = {{{Topology Optimization and Additive Manufacturing – A Perfect Symbiosis?}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}