@inproceedings{4372,
  abstract     = {{The use of mobile computing is expanding dramatically in recent years and trends indicate that “the future is mobile”. Nowadays, mobile computing plays an increasingly important role in the biomedical domain, and particularly in hospitals. The benefits of using mobile devices in hospitals are no longer disputed and many applications for medical care are already available. Many studies have proven that mobile technologies can bring various benefits for enhancing information management in the hospital. But is mobility a solution for every problem?

In this paper, we will demonstrate that mobility is not always an advantage. On the basis of a field study at the pediatric surgery of a large University Hospital, we have learned within a two-year long mobile computing project, that mobile devices have indeed many disadvantages, particularly in stressful and hectic situations and we conclude that mobile computing is not always advantageous.}},
  author       = {{Holzinger, Andreas and Sommerauer, Bettina and Spitzer, Peter and Juric, Simon and Zalik, Borut and Debevc, Matjaz and Lidynia, Chantal and Calero-Valdez, Andre and Röcker, Carsten and Ziefle, Martina}},
  booktitle    = {{Availability, Reliability, and Security in Information Systems}},
  editor       = {{Teufel, Stephanie and Min, Tjoa A. and You, Ilsun and Weippl, Edgar}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-319-10974-9}},
  keywords     = {{Mobile computing, real-world, user experience, hospital computing, medical informatics}},
  location     = {{Fribourg, Switzerland}},
  pages        = {{110 -- 123}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Mobile Computing is not Always Advantageous: Lessons Learned from a Real-World Case Study in a Hospital}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-10975-6_8}},
  volume       = {{8708}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}

@inproceedings{4373,
  abstract     = {{Today, usability measures for the evaluation of systems and interfaces are mostly assessed in an isolated way. This paper addresses the question whether an integrative multi-dimensional feature evaluation can lead to different and more holistic results. We combined traditional measures (e.g., time to task completion) with advanced measures, like eye tracking, biosignal data logging and assessment of user emotions. For the evaluation of emotions, we used verbal methods (PAD Semantic Scale and a questionnaire) and a nonverbal method with EmoCards. The overall goal was to document and analyze the interaction as completely as possible (including effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction), focusing especially on objective measurements. Furthermore, the recording and assessment of emotions, which are part of the user experience, should give insights into user satisfaction.}},
  author       = {{Ermes, Verena and Janß, Armin and Radermacher, Klaus and Röcker, Carsten}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare }},
  editor       = {{Hein, Andreas}},
  keywords     = {{Usability Measures, User Experience, Eye Tracking, Biosignal Data Logging, Emotion Evaluation, Risk Analysis, Medical Devices, Integrated Usability Evaluation}},
  location     = {{Oldenburg}},
  pages        = {{227 -- 230}},
  publisher    = {{ ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)}},
  title        = {{{Analyzing the Benefits of Integrative Multi-Dimensional Assessments of Usability Features in Interaction-Centered User Studies}}},
  doi          = {{10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.255142#d73284787e1}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}