@misc{12153,
  abstract     = {{In general gender differences have frequently been studied in experimental economics, but the findings remain inconclusive. In this study, we focus on gender differences in expectations and gender specific stereotypic mindsets in a dictator game, building on Blanckenburg, Tebbe, & Iseke (2023). We add to prior work by differentiating between stereotypical behavior and stereotypical expectations. Accordingly, we extended the classic dictator game by three steps in order to study whether recipients develop stereotypical beliefs regarding the dictator’s gender based on the amount of money the dictator has allocated to them. First, we asked recipients to estimate the amount. We then revealed the amount the dictator actually allocated to the recipient and finally, we asked the recipient to assess the dictator’s gender. In contrast to and building on previous results which show no gender differences regarding the amount the dictators allocate, we find evidence for stereotypical expectations of the recipients based on the amount the dictator allocates to them.}},
  author       = {{Austermann, Christine and von Blanckenburg, Korbinian and Iseke, Anja and Tebbe, Eva}},
  booktitle    = {{Journal of Economic Psychology}},
  issn         = {{0167-4870}},
  keywords     = {{Gender differences, Stereotypes, Dictator game, Economic behavior and expectations}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{Stereotypical behavior vs. expectations: Gender differences in a dictator game}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.joep.2024.102742}},
  volume       = {{103}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@misc{9670,
  abstract     = {{This study attempts to replicate experimental results from Chowdhury et al. published in SouthernEconomic Journal (2017).  They study gender differences in the giving and taking variants of thedictator game.  Using the same experimental design on a sample of German students our findingsdiffer from Chowdhury et al.  (2017).  In contrast to the original study, we do not find support foran asymmetric gender effect. Our results indicate that, on average, both men and women allocatesimilar amounts in the giving and in the taking frame.  Additional analyses indicate that men aremore likely than women to allocate nothing in the taking variant rather than in the giving variant,in line with Chowdhury et al. (2017)}},
  author       = {{von Blanckenburg, Korbinian and Tebbe, Eva and Iseke, Anja}},
  booktitle    = {{Journal of Comments and Replications in Economics}},
  issn         = {{2749-988X }},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics }},
  title        = {{{Giving and taking in dictator games – differences by gender? : A replication study of Chowdhury et al. (Southern Economic Journal, 2017)}}},
  doi          = {{ http://dx.doi.org/10.15456/j1.2021138.1037237398}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{2265,
  author       = {{Beyer, Christian and Tebbe, Eva and von Blanckenburg, Korbinian and Kottmann, Elke}},
  issn         = {{1466-4291}},
  journal      = {{Applied Economics Letters}},
  pages        = {{274--280}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Subject pool effects in price competition games: students versus professionals}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/13504851.2018.1467544}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{2266,
  author       = {{Tebbe, Eva and von Blanckenburg, Korbinian}},
  issn         = {{0169-5150}},
  journal      = {{Agricultural Economics}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{41--53}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell }},
  title        = {{{Does willingness to pay increase with the number and strictness of sustainability labels?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/agec.12394}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}