@misc{9650,
  abstract     = {{In Germany, there is much academic discourse on and scientific inquiry into pedagogical issues of science teaching and learning at the school level. Concepts like ‘Bildung’ (inquiry-based self-formation) or ‘Didaktik’ (instruction-based reflections on teaching) are almost directly associated with institutions or actors rooted in pedagogical departments. Unfortunately, those departments rarely focus on issues of science teaching and learning at the University level – and if they do so, they most often try to apply conceptions and models borrowed from upper or post-secondary education. The few research-based institutions that address specific issues of higher education are commonly fitted out so that they are nowhere near the impacts of research institutions covering teaching methodology in primary or secondary education, for example. Yet from an international perspective, the university as an institution does hold a great potential to improve educational practice in a systematic, cross-disciplinary and research-based way. Around the globe, more and more institutions rely on the notion of scholarship in this context: ‘The improvement of learning and teaching is dependent upon the development of scholarship and research in teaching’ (Prosser & Trigwell, 1999, p. 8). If incorporated at the heart of tertiary education, scholarship could contribute to develop new faculty in the German higher-educational sector.
}},
  author       = {{Schmohl, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{ International Conference New Perspectives in Science Education }},
  keywords     = {{Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Scholarship of Academic Development, Higher Education, community building}},
  location     = {{Florence, Italy}},
  publisher    = {{libreriauniversitaria.it edizioni}},
  title        = {{{Towards a New Scholarship of German Science Education}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9754,
  abstract     = {{Partizipative Methoden zum Thema Landschaft sind bei Entscheidungsprozessen im Zuge der Energiewende für die Öffentlichkeit von großer Bedeutung. Im der aktuellen Planungspraxis spielen sie aber allenfalls eine untergeordnete Rolle. Dies hat zum Teil sehr unterschiedliche Beobachtungen zur Folge, die allesamt dazu führen, dass die Landschaftsplanung Gefahr läuft, in ihrem Kerngeschäft ‚Landschaft‘ den lebensweltlichen Bezug der Öffentlichkeit zur Landschaft aus den Augen zu verlieren. Dementsprechend sind die Beobachtungen Symptome einer Fehlentwicklung des landschaftsplanerischen Umgangs mit den Erneuerbaren Energien. Die Lösung liegt vor allem in einem grundsätzlichen Umdenken der bisherigen Herangehensweisen. Energielandschaften müssen entworfen und gestaltet werden, Gerechtigkeitsdiskussionen geführt und Landschaftsargumenten mehr Bedeutung zugemessen werden.}},
  author       = {{Stemmer, Boris and Kaußen, Lucas}},
  booktitle    = {{Bausteine der Energiewende}},
  editor       = {{Kühne, Olaf and Weber, Florian}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-658-19508-3}},
  keywords     = {{Energiewende, Landschaft, Landschaftsbild, Partizipation}},
  pages        = {{489–507}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden }},
  title        = {{{Partizipative Methoden der Landschafts(bild)bewertung - Was soll das bringen?}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19509-0_24}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{9774,
  author       = {{Köppel, Johann and Rehhausen, Anke and Wende, Wolfgang and Albrecht, Juliane and Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe and Magel, Ina and Scholles, Frank and Putschky, Magrit and Hoppenstedt, Adrian and Stemmer, Boris}},
  publisher    = {{Umweltbundesamt}},
  title        = {{{Strategische Umweltprüfung und (neuartige) Pläne und Programme auf Bundesebene: Methoden, Verfahren und Rechtsgrundlagen: Abschlussbericht}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{9784,
  abstract     = {{Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) emerged from Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and was developed based on the procedural steps and understanding thereof, but with the goal to fulfil a more ‘strategic’ function. Federal level plans and programmes constitute the highest planning levels in Germany subject to SEA, as SEA for policies is not compulsory. In this article, we analyse the quality and procedural effectiveness of federal level SEA in Germany with the underlying hypothesis that federal level SEA might be more strategic than SEA at other planning levels, as it represents the highest tier. Therefore, we analysed three federal level SEA case studies in Germany according to a set of criteria and indicators based on international research outcomes, including SEA integration into decision-making, tiering, scoping, selection and assessment of alternatives, cumulative effects assessment, public participation, and monitoring. Results demonstrate that the procedural effectiveness of SEA practice at the federal level is limited in Germany, and the making of SEAs proved not to be as ‘strategic’ as its important role prior to subsequent planning processes and outcomes would suggest. Reasons include an alternatives assessment restricted to macro-siting instead of assessing scenarios of demand or system alternatives, tiering limited to general advice without specific guidance for subsequent planning levels, cumulative effects assessment limited to intra-plan effects, a lack of monitoring, and public participation limited to consultation on the environmental report. These findings support results from a variety of international studies. Reasons for limitations have been identified in current SEA regulations, prior policy-making, institutional settings, the institutions’ willingness to learn and limited quality management by the German Federal Environmental Agency. Thus, our recommendations aim to improve quality management and learning by initiating a federal level SEA forum to discuss federal level planning and SEA practice and related issues, expanding the federal EIA portal to SEAs, quality management by the German Federal Environmental Agency in every federal level SEA scoping process and for every federal level environmental report, and further research and development to improve SEA practice. However, the general question for SEA research might be whether SEA contributes to long-term institutional learning processes beyond individual SEA processes, and how those learning processes can be supported, for instance by quality management and capacity building.}},
  author       = {{Rehhausen, Anke and Köppel, Johann and Scholles, Frank and Stemmer, Boris and Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe and Magel, Ina and Geißler, Gesa and Wende, Wolfgang}},
  booktitle    = {{Environmental Impact Assessment Review}},
  pages        = {{41–59}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{Quality of federal level strategic environmental assessment – A case study analysis for transport, transmission grid and maritime spatial planning in Germany}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.002}},
  volume       = {{73}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9870,
  author       = {{Bruns, Diedrich and Stemmer, Boris}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbook on Landscape Character Assessment}},
  editor       = {{Swanwick, Caris and Fairclough, Graham and Sarlov-Herlin, Ingrid}},
  isbn         = {{978-1138803886}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Landscape Assessment in Germany}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9919,
  author       = {{Riedl, Ulrich}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{26--33}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Rückblick}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9920,
  author       = {{Türk, Winfried}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{38--41}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Kalkmagerrasen in Ostwestfalen-Lippe - eine Erfolgsstory}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9921,
  author       = {{Lohr, Mathias}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{42--43}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Weidetiere fressen für die Artenvielfalt - oder warum der Naturschutz mit der Reaktivierung von Hutewäldern neue Wege beschreitet}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9922,
  author       = {{Riedl, Ulrich}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{48--51}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Grundlagenforschung an einer University of Applied Sciences}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9923,
  author       = {{Riedl, Ulrich}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{56--59}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Forschung am Puls der Zeit - Die Energiewende landschafts- und naturverträglich mitgestalten}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9924,
  author       = {{Maas, Klaus and Wrenger, Burkhard}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{60--63}},
  title        = {{{Fernerkundung und Drohnen als Analyse-Werkzeuge in der Kulturlandschaft}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9925,
  author       = {{Rohler, Hans-Peter}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{64--65}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Bausteine für urbane Kulturlandschaften}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9926,
  author       = {{Riedl, Ulrich}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{66--69}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Ein harmonischer Dreiklang: Forschung - Transfer - Lehre}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9927,
  author       = {{Stemmer, Boris}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{70--73}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Lehre und Forschung - Beispiele aus einem aktuellen Forschungsvorhaben}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9928,
  author       = {{Stemmer, Boris}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{90--95}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Forschungsstrategie 25+}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{9929,
  author       = {{Riedl, Ulrich}},
  booktitle    = {{25 Jahre Forschungsschwerpunkt Kulturlandschaft}},
  editor       = {{Riedl, Ulrich and Herber, Katrin and Lohr, Mathias and Eller-Studzinsky, Bettina}},
  pages        = {{96--98}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Ausklang}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{998,
  author       = {{Gabriel, Lydia}},
  keywords     = {{Design, Feminismus, Gesellschaft, Grafikdesign, Magazin}},
  pages        = {{123}},
  publisher    = {{Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe}},
  title        = {{{Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung des Designs in Bezug auf frauenspezifische und feministische Magazine unter Berücksichtigung von Frauen im Design}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}