---
res:
  bibo_abstract:
  - At the HUMAN’25 workshop, four members of the hypertext research community reflected
    on the “hypertext as method” argument; specifically, the idea that hypertext should
    be understood as a method of inquiry rather than as merely a type of system. These
    community members presented position statements to address challenges stemming
    from this proposed method, including designing interfaces for LLMs, supporting
    annotation and note-taking as cognitive tools, evaluating AI as a collaborator
    in intellectual work, and applying hypertext analysis to historical information
    networks. These positions and the subsequent discussion contained several common
    themes, including a preference for augmentation over automation and concerns that
    generative AI may encourage users to disengage from critical thinking.@eng
  bibo_authorlist:
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Mark
      foaf_name: Bernstein, Mark
      foaf_surname: Bernstein
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: James
      foaf_name: Blustein, James
      foaf_surname: Blustein
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Cathy
      foaf_name: Marshall, Cathy
      foaf_surname: Marshall
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Mariusz
      foaf_name: Pisarski, Mariusz
      foaf_surname: Pisarski
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Peter
      foaf_name: Nürnberg, Peter
      foaf_surname: Nürnberg
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: 'Claus '
      foaf_name: 'Atzenbeck, Claus '
      foaf_surname: Atzenbeck
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Jessica
      foaf_name: Rubart, Jessica
      foaf_surname: Rubart
      foaf_workInfoHomepage: http://www.librecat.org/personId=45672
    orcid: 0000-0003-0937-3551
  bibo_doi: 10.1145/3759439.3773695
  dct_date: 2026^xs_gYear
  dct_language: eng
  dct_publisher: ACM Press@
  dct_title: Hypertext as Method—Continued@
...
