@misc{13814,
  abstract     = {{At the HUMAN’25 workshop, four members of the hypertext research community reflected on the “hypertext as method” argument; specifically, the idea that hypertext should be understood as a method of inquiry rather than as merely a type of system. These community members presented position statements to address challenges stemming from this proposed method, including designing interfaces for LLMs, supporting annotation and note-taking as cognitive tools, evaluating AI as a collaborator in intellectual work, and applying hypertext analysis to historical information networks. These positions and the subsequent discussion contained several common themes, including a preference for augmentation over automation and concerns that generative AI may encourage users to disengage from critical thinking.}},
  author       = {{Bernstein, Mark and Blustein, James and Marshall, Cathy and Pisarski, Mariusz and Nürnberg, Peter and Atzenbeck, Claus  and Rubart, Jessica}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN '25)}},
  location     = {{London, UK; hybrid}},
  publisher    = {{ACM Press}},
  title        = {{{Hypertext as Method—Continued}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/3759439.3773695}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}