<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Co-Creative Robotics Turn-Based Human–Robot Assembly for Architectural Design Exploration</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Sachs, Hans</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Aykin, Yusuf</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Sardenberg, Victor</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Schneider, Bo</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>eCAADe, eCaade</dc:creator>
   	<dc:subject>Co Creative Robots</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Collaborative Robots</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Architecture</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>ddc:600</dc:subject>
   	<dc:description>This paper investigates co-creativity in architectural robotics through
a design-research experiment that repositions the robot from a fabrication tool
to an active collaborator in spatial exploration. A turn-based assembly process
enables a human designer and a robotic arm to alternately place modular bricks
within a shared three-dimensional environment. Each move is evaluated through
computational rules—support, stability, and collision—and interpreted in real
time via an AI image-to-image diffusion model. This sequential exchange
establishes a reciprocal design dialogue: the human reads the robot’s action as
a spatial proposition, while the robot responds to the evolving structure.
Creative agency becomes distributed across human and machine, encouraging
reflection on intent and positioning robotic intelligence as a source of suggestion
rather than execution. By prioritizing responsiveness and interpretation over
efficiency, the research challenges conventional file-to-factory paradigms and
frames robotics as an active participant in design thinking. It contributes to
discussions on human–machine collaboration by proposing co-creative robotics
as a framework for rethinking authorship in architecture.
Keywords. Human–robot Collaboration, Co-Creation, Computational
Creativity, Robotic Fabrication, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Fabrication,
Generative Models, Discrete Assembly, Human–Machine Interaction.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>CumInCAD</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2026</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/other</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:other</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/record/14042</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:identifier>https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/download/14042/14043</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Sachs H, Aykin Y, Sardenberg V, Schneider B. &lt;i&gt;Co-Creative Robotics Turn-Based Human–Robot Assembly for Architectural Design Exploration&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 44. 1st ed. (eCAADe  eCaade, ed.). CumInCAD; 2026:357-366.</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
