<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/record/14042">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/record/14042"/>
        <dc:title>Co-Creative Robotics Turn-Based Human–Robot Assembly for Architectural Design Exploration</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>This paper investigates co-creativity in architectural robotics through
a design-research experiment that repositions the robot from a fabrication tool
to an active collaborator in spatial exploration. A turn-based assembly process
enables a human designer and a robotic arm to alternately place modular bricks
within a shared three-dimensional environment. Each move is evaluated through
computational rules—support, stability, and collision—and interpreted in real
time via an AI image-to-image diffusion model. This sequential exchange
establishes a reciprocal design dialogue: the human reads the robot’s action as
a spatial proposition, while the robot responds to the evolving structure.
Creative agency becomes distributed across human and machine, encouraging
reflection on intent and positioning robotic intelligence as a source of suggestion
rather than execution. By prioritizing responsiveness and interpretation over
efficiency, the research challenges conventional file-to-factory paradigms and
frames robotics as an active participant in design thinking. It contributes to
discussions on human–machine collaboration by proposing co-creative robotics
as a framework for rethinking authorship in architecture.
Keywords. Human–robot Collaboration, Co-Creation, Computational
Creativity, Robotic Fabrication, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Fabrication,
Generative Models, Discrete Assembly, Human–Machine Interaction.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:volume>44</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:startPage>357-366</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>357-366</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>CumInCAD</dc:publisher>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <ore:aggregates rdf:resource="https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/download/14042/14043/ecaade2026_93.pdf"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
